Easy2 marksMultiple Choice
Audit Framework and RegulationEthicsProfessional Conduct
This question is part of a case study — click to read the full scenario(Case 01)

SECTION A - CASE 1: AQUAPURIFY NGO

AquaPurify NGO is a global charity providing clean water infrastructure in developing nations. You are the audit manager at Grant & Co. The audit for the year ended 31 March 20X6 is being planned. The audit engagement partner, Sarah Jenkins, has been on the engagement for seven years. AquaPurify recently received a massive government grant that requires a separate assurance report. The charity's finance director, a former Grant & Co audit manager who left the firm 18 months ago, has offered the audit team a complimentary luxury safari trip 'as a thank you for their hard work'. Furthermore, Grant & Co has been asked to provide internal audit services to AquaPurify.

Which of the following correctly identifies the ethical threat created by Sarah Jenkins serving as the engagement partner for seven years, and the appropriate safeguard?

ACCA · Question 02 · Audit Framework and Regulation

SECTION A - CASE 1: AQUAPURIFY NGO

AquaPurify NGO is a global charity providing clean water infrastructure in developing nations. You are the audit manager at Grant & Co. The audit for the year ended 31 March 20X6 is being planned. The audit engagement partner, Sarah Jenkins, has been on the engagement for seven years. AquaPurify recently received a massive government grant that requires a separate assurance report. The charity's finance director, a former Grant & Co audit manager who left the firm 18 months ago, has offered the audit team a complimentary luxury safari trip 'as a thank you for their hard work'. Furthermore, Grant & Co has been asked to provide internal audit services to AquaPurify.

How should Grant & Co respond to the offer of the luxury safari trip?

Answer options:

A.

Accept the offer, provided it is disclosed to the audit committee.

B.

Accept the offer only for junior team members who do not make key audit judgments.

C.

The offer must be declined as it creates a significant self-interest and familiarity threat that cannot be reduced to an acceptable level.

D.

Decline the offer, but request that the equivalent value be paid as an audit fee bonus.

How to approach this question

Evaluate the value of the gift. If it is not trivial and inconsequential, it must be declined.

Full Answer

C.The offer must be declined as it creates a significant self-interest and familiarity threat that cannot be reduced to an acceptable level.✓ Correct
According to the ACCA Code of Ethics, auditors must not accept gifts or hospitality unless the value is trivial and inconsequential. A luxury safari trip is clearly of significant value and creates insurmountable self-interest and familiarity threats. It must be declined.

Common mistakes

Believing that disclosure to the audit committee makes accepting large gifts permissible.

Practice the full ACCA AA — Audit and Assurance Practice Exam 2

18 questions · hints · full answers · grading

More questions from this exam