ACCA AAA — Advanced Audit and Assurance Practice Exam 1
3 free questions · No sign-up required to browse
A complete 100-mark mock exam replicating the ACCA Advanced Audit and Assurance (AAA) syllabus. This exam features a 50-mark strategic case study on group audit planning and two 25-mark advisory reports covering completion, reporting, and non-audit assurance engagements. Scenarios are designed to test advanced application of auditing standards, ethical frameworks, and professional judgment in complex, realistic business environments.
Difficulty breakdown
Topics covered
Browse all topics →Sample questions
SECTION A: STRATEGIC CASE STUDY
You are an audit manager in the firm of Krest & Co, responsible for the audit of the Vulcan Group (the Group), a listed multinational entity operating in the heavy manufacturing sector. The Group has historically focused on steel production but is currently undergoing a strategic transition toward manufacturing components for renewable energy infrastructure (wind turbines and solar panel mounts).
You are planning the audit for the financial year ending 31 March 202X. The audit engagement partner, Sarah Jenkins, has sent you the following email.
EXHIBIT 1: EMAIL FROM AUDIT PARTNER
To: Audit Manager
From: Sarah Jenkins, Audit Engagement Partner
Date: 15 February 202X
Subject: Audit planning for the Vulcan Group
Hello,
I have just returned from a planning meeting with the Group Finance Director, Marcus Thorne. The Group is undergoing significant changes. To accelerate their green transition, Vulcan acquired 80% of the equity shares in Solaris Tech Co (Solaris) on 1 October 202X. Solaris is located in Farland, a foreign jurisdiction with a different currency (the Farland Franc - FF). Solaris is audited by a local firm, Farland Audit Partners.
Furthermore, to fund this acquisition and the retooling of their existing factories, the Group secured a major syndicated loan of $150m on 1 July 202X. The loan carries strict covenants related to the Group's interest cover and debt-to-equity ratio.
I have attached some draft financial extracts (Exhibit 2) and notes from my meeting regarding quality management and ethical matters (Exhibit 3).
Please prepare briefing notes for my review which address the following requirements:
(a) Evaluate the business risks facing the Vulcan Group. (10 marks)
(b) Evaluate the audit risks to be considered in planning the Group audit. (18 marks)
(c) Evaluate the ethical and quality management issues arising from the matters detailed in Exhibit 3, recommending appropriate actions. (12 marks)
(d) Design the principal audit procedures to be performed in respect of the classification and valuation of the Solaris acquisition. (6 marks)
Note: 4 professional marks are available for the structure, layout, logical flow, and clarity of your briefing notes.
EXHIBIT 2: DRAFT FINANCIAL EXTRACTS AND NOTES
(All figures in $m)
Draft 31 Mar 202X | Actual 31 Mar 202W
Revenue: 845.0 | 790.0
Cost of Sales: (610.0) | (520.0)
Gross Profit: 235.0 | 270.0
Operating Expenses: (145.0) | (110.0)
Operating Profit: 90.0 | 160.0
Total Assets: 1,250.0 | 980.0
Total Liabilities: 850.0 | 500.0
Notes from FD meeting:
- Revenue includes $45m from a new 'Green Infrastructure' contract. Vulcan has recognized the full contract value upfront, although installation and maintenance services will be provided over the next 3 years.
- The restructuring of the legacy steel plants has begun. A restructuring provision of $35m was recognized in December 202X following a board decision, though formal announcements to the workforce are scheduled for April 202X.
EXHIBIT 3: QUALITY MANAGEMENT AND ETHICAL MATTERS
- Marcus Thorne (Group FD) has requested that Krest & Co provide valuation services for a patent owned by Solaris, which is required for the consolidated financial statements. The fee proposed is highly lucrative.
- The audit senior who led the fieldwork last year, David Chen, recently resigned from Krest & Co and joined Vulcan Group as their Chief Internal Auditor in January 202X.
- Due to resource constraints, I am considering using a junior audit team for the inventory counts at the legacy steel plants, as they are 'low risk' compared to the new green tech divisions.
REQUIREMENT:
Respond to the partner's email by preparing the requested briefing notes.
SECTION B: ADVISORY REPORT
You are an audit manager at Zenith LLP, responsible for the audit of CloudNova Co, a rapidly growing Software as a Service (SaaS) provider. The audit is for the year ended 31 December 202X. The fieldwork is nearly complete, and you are reviewing the audit files prior to drafting the auditor's report. CloudNova is planning an Initial Public Offering (IPO) in late 202Y.
You have identified two significant matters during your review:
Matter 1: Capitalized Development Costs
CloudNova has capitalized $8.5m of development costs relating to a new AI-driven analytics module. The module was officially launched to customers on 1 November 202X. However, management has not commenced amortization of these costs, arguing that the software is still undergoing 'minor bug fixes' and the useful life cannot yet be reliably estimated. Total total assets are $45m and profit before tax is $12m.
Matter 2: Going Concern and Subsequent Events
On 15 February 202Y, CloudNova's largest customer, representing 35% of recurring revenue, filed for bankruptcy. Consequently, CloudNova's cash flow forecasts show a severe cash deficit by August 202Y. Management has disclosed the customer's bankruptcy as a non-adjusting subsequent event in the notes to the financial statements but insists the company remains a going concern because they are 'confident' the upcoming IPO will raise sufficient capital. No adjustments have been made to the financial statements regarding the going concern basis.
REQUIREMENTS:
(a) In respect of Matter 1 (Capitalized Development Costs):
(i) Evaluate the matters you should consider before concluding on the accounting treatment. (5 marks)
(ii) Describe the audit evidence you would expect to find in the audit file to support your evaluation. (5 marks)
(b) In respect of Matter 2 (Going Concern and Subsequent Events):
Evaluate the implications for the completion of the audit and assess the impact on the auditor's report if management refuses to amend the financial statements or disclosures. (15 marks)
SECTION B: ADVISORY REPORT
You are a manager in the special assignments department of Apex Advisory. You have been approached by the GlobalCare Foundation (GCF), a large international Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) focused on providing clean water infrastructure in developing nations. GCF is not an existing audit client of your firm.
GCF is applying for a massive $50m matched-funding grant from the World Health Agency (WHA). To secure this grant, WHA requires GCF to submit a detailed 3-year cash flow forecast (Prospective Financial Information - PFI), accompanied by an independent assurance report.
The GCF Finance Director has requested that Apex Advisory undertake this engagement to examine and report on the 3-year cash flow forecast. The forecast includes highly ambitious assumptions regarding future public donations, which management expects to double over the next three years due to a planned celebrity endorsement campaign. Furthermore, the forecast assumes that inflation in the countries where infrastructure will be built will remain flat at 2%, despite historical volatility.
REQUIREMENTS:
(a) Evaluate the matters Apex Advisory should consider before accepting the engagement to report on GCF's Prospective Financial Information (PFI). (10 marks)
(b) Describe the specific examination procedures you would perform to assess the validity and reasonableness of the assumptions underlying the 3-year cash flow forecast. (10 marks)
(c) Contrast the level of assurance and the form of conclusion provided in a PFI assurance report with that of a standard statutory audit report on historical financial statements. (5 marks)
Ready to Practice the full exam?
All 3 questions with worked answers, mark schemes, and AI tutoring.
Expert