For IndividualsFor Educators
ExpertMinds LogoExpertMinds
ExpertMinds

Ace your certifications with Practice Exams and AI assistance.

  • Browse Exams
  • For Educators
  • Blog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookie Policy
  • Support
  • AWS SAA Exam Prep
  • PMI PMP Exam Prep
  • CPA Exam Prep
  • GCP PCA Exam Prep

© 2026 TinyHive Labs. Company number 16262776.

    PracticeACCAACCA ATX — Advanced Taxation Practice Exam 6Question 01
    Hard50 marksExtended Response
    Advanced Corporate Tax PlanningCorporation TaxSubstantial Shareholding ExemptionOverseas BranchesControlled Foreign Companies

    ACCA · Question 01 · Advanced Corporate Tax Planning

    SECTION A: STRATEGIC CASE STUDY

    You are a tax manager in a firm of Chartered Certified Accountants. You have been approached by the Board of Directors of AeroGrid Renewables plc ('AeroGrid'), a UK-resident company specializing in the development and operation of offshore wind farms and smart-grid infrastructure. AeroGrid prepares accounts to 31 March each year.

    The Board requires your advice on three upcoming strategic events:

    Exhibit 1: Disposal of Solaris Ltd
    AeroGrid owns 100% of the ordinary share capital of Solaris Ltd, a UK-resident company manufacturing solar panels. AeroGrid acquired this holding in May 2018 for £12 million. On 1 December 2024, AeroGrid plans to sell its entire shareholding in Solaris Ltd to an unconnected third party for £45 million. Solaris Ltd has been a trading company since incorporation. However, in the last 18 months, Solaris Ltd has accumulated a significant cash balance of £15 million from retained profits, which it has invested in a portfolio of listed shares. The trading assets of Solaris Ltd are valued at £20 million.

    Exhibit 2: Expansion into 'Country X'
    AeroGrid plans to expand its operations into Country X, a rapidly developing nation with no double tax treaty with the UK. The corporate tax rate in Country X is 12%. AeroGrid expects the Country X operations to generate trading losses of £3 million in the first year (year ending 31 March 2025), followed by annual taxable profits of £8 million thereafter. The Board is undecided whether to structure this expansion as an overseas branch of AeroGrid or by incorporating a wholly-owned subsidiary in Country X.

    Exhibit 3: Transfer of Intangible Assets
    AeroGrid has developed a proprietary software algorithm for optimizing wind turbine efficiency. The software was developed in-house between 2019 and 2021 at a cost of £2.5 million, which was capitalized. AeroGrid intends to transfer the intellectual property (IP) rights of this software to a newly formed, wholly-owned subsidiary in the Republic of Ireland ('AeroGrid IRE'). The market value of the IP is estimated at £18 million. AeroGrid IRE will license the software back to AeroGrid and to third parties.

    REQUIREMENT:
    Write a report to the Board of Directors of AeroGrid Renewables plc advising on the tax implications of the proposed transactions.

    Your report should cover:
    (a) The corporation tax implications of the disposal of Solaris Ltd, specifically evaluating the availability of the Substantial Shareholding Exemption (SSE) given the recent accumulation of investment assets. (12 marks)
    (b) A comparative analysis of structuring the Country X expansion as a branch versus a subsidiary, focusing on loss relief, the taxation of future profits, and the application of the Controlled Foreign Company (CFC) rules. Recommend the most tax-efficient structure. (18 marks)
    (c) The UK corporation tax and transfer pricing implications of transferring the proprietary software to AeroGrid IRE, including the application of the Intangible Fixed Assets (IFA) regime. (10 marks)

    Professional Skills marks are available for the structure, clarity, and professional tone of the report, as well as the demonstration of commercial acumen in your recommendations. (10 marks)

    How to approach this question

    Approach this strategic case study by breaking down each exhibit. For Exhibit 1, identify the core relief (SSE) and immediately spot the distractor/issue: the large cash/investment balance threatening the 'trading company' status. For Exhibit 2, create a comparative matrix in your mind: Branch vs Sub for Losses, then for Profits, then for Anti-avoidance (CFC). For Exhibit 3, recognize the asset type (post-2002 IFA), the connected party rule (market value), and the anti-avoidance implications (Transfer Pricing/CFC) of moving IP offshore.

    Full Answer

    This question tests the interaction of corporate taxes in complex, high-value scenarios. The SSE rules are generous but strict on the trading requirement; passive assets can taint the whole group. Overseas expansion requires balancing immediate loss relief against long-term tax rates, bringing in DTR and CFC rules. Moving IP offshore is heavily regulated by the IFA market value rules and transfer pricing to prevent base erosion.

    Common mistakes

    Students often forget to apply the 20% 'substantial' test to the asset base in SSE questions, assuming any trading company qualifies. Another common error is assuming overseas subsidiary losses can be group relieved in the UK (they cannot, post-Brexit/EEA rules). Finally, students often miss the 'dry tax charge' that arises when transferring assets at market value to connected parties without actual cash changing hands.
    All questionsQuestion 02

    Practice the full ACCA ATX — Advanced Taxation Practice Exam 6

    3 questions · hints · full answers · grading

    Sign up freeTake the exam

    More questions from this exam

    Q02SECTION B: ADVISORY REPORT You are a tax advisor acting for Lord Alistair Vance (aged 72), a hig...HardQ03SECTION B: ADVISORY REPORT You are a tax advisor to Nexus Cyber-Security LLP ('Nexus'), a highly...Hard
    View all 3 questions →