For IndividualsFor Educators
ExpertMinds LogoExpertMinds
ExpertMinds

Ace your certifications with Practice Exams and AI assistance.

  • Browse Exams
  • For Educators
  • Blog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookie Policy
  • Support
  • AWS SAA Exam Prep
  • PMI PMP Exam Prep
  • CPA Exam Prep
  • GCP PCA Exam Prep

© 2026 TinyHive Labs. Company number 16262776.

    PracticeACCAACCA BT — Business & Technology Practice Exam 4Question 52
    Hard4 marksMultiple Choice
    Syllabus F: Professional ethicsSyllabus FProfessional EthicsEthical ThreatsIFAC Principles

    ACCA · Question 52 · Syllabus F: Professional ethics

    Section B (Syllabus F)

    Scenario: Marcus is an audit manager at a mid-tier accounting firm, currently auditing 'Apex Holdings'. During the audit, Marcus discovers a complex web of undisclosed related-party transactions between Apex Holdings and a private offshore company owned by Apex's CEO. When Marcus raises this, the CEO threatens to cancel the audit contract and publicly ruin Marcus's professional reputation. Marcus's own firm partner tells him to 'just drop it' because Apex is their most lucrative client.

    Based on the scenario and your knowledge of professional ethics (Syllabus F), select the FOUR correct statements.

    Answer options:

    A.

    The CEO's threat to ruin Marcus's reputation is a clear example of an Intimidation threat.

    B.

    The audit partner's instruction to 'drop it' because Apex is a lucrative client represents a Self-interest threat for the audit firm.

    C.

    If Marcus complies and ignores the undisclosed transactions, he will be in direct breach of the fundamental principle of Objectivity.

    D.

    If Marcus complies, he will also breach the principle of Integrity by being associated with financial statements that omit required disclosures.

    E.

    Marcus should resolve this by applying an Advocacy threat safeguard, such as promoting the CEO's offshore company.

    F.

    The principle of Confidentiality prevents Marcus from reporting this issue to his firm's internal ethics committee.

    How to approach this question

    Identify the threats: CEO threatening = Intimidation. Partner wanting money = Self-interest. Identify the breached principles if he yields: Yielding to pressure = loss of Objectivity. Signing off on hidden data = loss of Integrity.

    Full Answer

    This MTQ tests the IFAC fundamental principles and structural threats. The CEO creates an Intimidation threat (A). The partner creates a Self-interest threat (B). Yielding breaches Objectivity (C) and Integrity (D). Statement E is nonsensical. Statement F is wrong because confidentiality has exceptions for legal/ethical reporting and internal consultation.

    Common mistakes

    Thinking that obeying a senior partner absolves the manager of their own ethical responsibilities under the IFAC code.
    Question 51All questions

    Practice the full ACCA BT — Business & Technology Practice Exam 4

    52 questions · hints · full answers · grading

    Sign up freeTake the exam

    More questions from this exam

    Q01Section A AstroDyne is a commercial space-tech startup developing low-earth orbit satellite depl...MediumQ02Section A Titanium Forge, a heavy manufacturing plant, is planning a massive expansion that will...EasyQ03Section A Verdant Retreats operates ultra-luxury eco-lodges in remote rainforests. They recently...MediumQ04Section A GhostBites operates a network of 'cloud kitchens' (delivery-only food preparation faci...MediumQ05Section A GreenYield is an agricultural organization owned entirely by the farmers who supply ra...Easy
    View all 52 questions →