Hard2 marksMultiple Choice
Corporate and Business LawSection ASyllabus BObligations

ACCA · Question 05 · Corporate and Business Law

A cross-border logistics company, TransGlobal Freight, urgently asks an independent consultant to resolve a customs impoundment issue in a foreign port. No fee is discussed. The consultant successfully resolves the issue. Afterwards, TransGlobal promises to pay the consultant £5,000 for their effort, but later refuses to pay. Can the consultant enforce the promise?

Answer options:

A.

No, because the consideration is past, making the promise unenforceable.

B.

No, because there was no written contract formed before the work commenced.

C.

Yes, because the act was done at the promisor's request and it was understood that payment would be made.

D.

Yes, but only under the doctrine of promissory estoppel.

How to approach this question

Identify the rule of past consideration and its specific exceptions (the doctrine of implied assumpsit).

Full Answer

C.Yes, because the act was done at the promisor's request and it was understood that payment would be made.✓ Correct
Generally, past consideration is not good consideration. However, the exception (established in Lampleigh v Braithwaite and refined in Pao On v Lau Yiu Long) applies if: 1) the act was done at the promisor's request, 2) there was an implied understanding that payment would be made (typical in commercial contexts), and 3) the payment would have been legally enforceable if promised in advance.

Common mistakes

Applying the general rule of past consideration without recognizing the commercial exception.

Practice the full ACCA LW — Corporate and Business Law Practice Exam 4

60 questions · hints · full answers · grading

More questions from this exam