For IndividualsFor Educators
ExpertMinds LogoExpertMinds
ExpertMinds

Ace your certifications with Practice Exams and AI assistance.

  • Browse Exams
  • For Educators
  • Blog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookie Policy
  • Support
  • AWS SAA Exam Prep
  • PMI PMP Exam Prep
  • CPA Exam Prep
  • GCP PCA Exam Prep

© 2026 TinyHive Labs. Company number 16262776.

    PracticeACCAACCA PM — Performance Management Practice Exam 6Question 23
    Medium2 marksMultiple Choice
    Budgeting and controlVariancesPerformance Interpretation

    ACCA · Question 23 · Budgeting and control

    Section B - Case 2: GreenYield Agri

    GreenYield Agri produces 'CropBoost', a specialized liquid fertilizer. The standard mix for 10,000 liters of input is:

    • Chemical A: 6,000 liters at $10 per liter
    • Chemical B: 4,000 liters at $15 per liter
      Standard normal loss is 20% of input (so 10,000 liters input yields 8,000 liters of CropBoost).

    In May, GreenYield inputted 10,000 liters in total, consisting of 7,000 liters of Chemical A and 3,000 liters of Chemical B. Actual yield was 7,600 liters of CropBoost.

    Which of the following best explains the relationship between the mix and yield variances calculated for May?

    Answer options:

    A.

    Using a higher proportion of the cheaper Chemical A resulted in a favorable mix variance, but degraded the quality of the process, leading to higher wastage and an adverse yield variance.

    B.

    Using a higher proportion of the expensive Chemical B resulted in an adverse mix variance, but improved the yield.

    C.

    The production manager successfully optimized both cost and output quality.

    D.

    The variances are unrelated and caused by external market price fluctuations.

    How to approach this question

    Look at the results: Favorable mix (cheaper inputs) and Adverse yield (less output). Connect the cause and effect.

    Full Answer

    A.Using a higher proportion of the cheaper Chemical A resulted in a favorable mix variance, but degraded the quality of the process, leading to higher wastage and an adverse yield variance.✓ Correct
    The mix variance was $5,000 Favorable because the company used more of the cheaper Chemical A (7,000L instead of 6,000L). However, this cheaper mix likely caused the chemical reaction to be less efficient, resulting in higher wastage (2,400L lost instead of 2,000L) and an adverse yield variance of $6,000. This highlights the danger of looking at variances in isolation.

    Common mistakes

    Failing to recognize the interdependent relationship between mix and yield.
    Question 22All questionsQuestion 24

    Practice the full ACCA PM — Performance Management Practice Exam 6

    32 questions · hints · full answers · grading

    Sign up freeTake the exam

    More questions from this exam

    Q1**Section A** A global logistics NGO uses Big Data analytics to optimize its disaster relief sup...EasyQ2**Section A** FinTech Innovators Inc. is migrating its management accounting systems to a public...MediumQ3**Section A** A commercial forestry company uses an Executive Information System (EIS) to monito...EasyQ4**Section A** SolarTech manufactures solar panels. The factory has a total operating cost of $12...MediumQ5**Section A** A chemical manufacturing company is implementing Environmental Management Accounti...Medium
    View all 32 questions →