Hard8 marksExtended Response
AQA GCSE · Question 07.2 · Active Citizenship
'The legal system in the UK allows citizens to receive justice.'
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
In your answer you should consider a range of evidence and views on:
• citizens' rights within the legal system
• the actions citizens can take to hold those in power to account
• the role played by citizens acting together in fighting for justice.
'The legal system in the UK allows citizens to receive justice.'
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
In your answer you should consider a range of evidence and views on:
• citizens' rights within the legal system
• the actions citizens can take to hold those in power to account
• the role played by citizens acting together in fighting for justice.
How to approach this question
This is a 'to what extent' question, which requires a balanced argument. Use the bullet points to structure your response.
1. **Agreeing with the statement:** Discuss the strengths of the UK legal system. Talk about citizens' rights (fair trial, independent judiciary) and how citizens can use the law (judicial review, campaigns like Hillsborough) to get justice.
2. **Disagreeing with the statement:** Discuss the weaknesses and barriers. Focus on issues like the cost of legal action and cuts to legal aid, which make it hard for ordinary people to access justice.
3. **Conclusion:** Give your overall judgement. Do you agree completely, partially, or not at all? Summarise your main points to justify your final position.
Full Answer
To a large extent, the UK legal system does allow citizens to receive justice, but there are significant barriers that prevent this from being true for everyone.
On one hand, the system has strong foundations that promote justice. Citizens have clearly defined rights, such as the right to a fair trial, the right to legal representation, and the principle that one is 'innocent until proven guilty'. These rights are protected by an independent judiciary, meaning judges make decisions based on the law, free from political interference. Furthermore, citizens can use the legal system to hold power to account through mechanisms like judicial review, where the legality of government actions can be challenged in court. This shows the system is designed to deliver justice and protect citizens from the state.
Citizens acting together can also successfully fight for justice. For example, the campaign by the families of the Hillsborough disaster victims used the legal system over many years to challenge the original inquest verdicts and police narratives. Their collective action eventually led to new inquests which found the fans were unlawfully killed, a clear example of citizens using the system to achieve justice against powerful institutions.
However, there are significant limitations. The biggest barrier is cost. Drastic cuts to legal aid have meant that many people on low incomes cannot afford a lawyer for civil cases, such as housing or family disputes. This creates a two-tier system where justice is more accessible to the wealthy. This undermines the principle of equality before the law. The system can also be slow, complex, and intimidating for ordinary people to navigate without professional help.
In conclusion, while the UK legal system has the principles and mechanisms in place to allow citizens to receive justice, and there are inspiring examples of this happening, access to that justice is unequal. The high cost and complexity of the system mean that, for many, justice remains out of reach. Therefore, I only partially agree with the statement.
This question asks for a nuanced evaluation of the UK's legal system. A good answer will avoid a simple 'yes' or 'no' and instead argue 'to a certain extent'. You should use the provided bullet points to guide your thinking. For 'citizens' rights', you can discuss principles like the rule of law and trial by jury. For 'holding power to account', judicial review is a key concept. For 'citizens acting together', famous justice campaigns (Hillsborough, Stephen Lawrence) are excellent examples. To provide balance, you must also discuss the significant barriers, with the cuts to legal aid being the most prominent contemporary issue. Your conclusion should weigh these positive and negative aspects to form a final judgement.
Common mistakes
Only discussing the positive aspects of the legal system without considering the barriers. Also, not providing specific examples (like a particular campaign or a legal principle like 'judicial review') to support the points being made.
Practice the full AQA GCSE Citizenship Studies Paper 1
23 questions · hints · full answers · grading
More questions from this exam
Q01.1Identify one role of a councillor.EasyQ01.2Identify one way councillors can be held accountable for their actions.EasyQ01.3Identify one advantage and one disadvantage of joining a political party.EasyQ01.4Explain the term 'volunteering' in the context of active citizenship.EasyQ01.5Explain one reason why a citizen would join a local pressure group.Easy
Expert