Medium1 markMultiple Choice
Domain 1.3: Reliable ArchitecturesDisaster RecoveryRPO/RTOArchitecture

AWS SAP-C02 · Question 08 · Domain 1.3: Reliable Architectures

A healthcare company is designing a disaster recovery strategy for a critical application. The application uses EC2 instances and an RDS SQL Server database. The business requires an RPO of 15 minutes and an RTO of 4 hours. The solution must be as cost-effective as possible. Which DR strategy should the architect choose?

Answer options:

A.

Backup and Restore: Take hourly RDS snapshots and EC2 AMIs. Copy them to the DR region.

B.

Pilot Light: Replicate the RDS database to the DR region. Keep EC2 instances stopped or use Auto Scaling with capacity 0.

C.

Warm Standby: Run a scaled-down version of the application in the DR region.

D.

Multi-Site Active-Active: Run full capacity in both regions.

How to approach this question

Balance the RTO of 4 hours (allows time to spin up compute) with the need for cost-effectiveness.

Full Answer

B.Pilot Light: Replicate the RDS database to the DR region. Keep EC2 instances stopped or use Auto Scaling with capacity 0.✓ Correct
Pilot Light
Pilot Light maintains a live database replica (ensuring low RPO) but keeps compute resources scaled to zero or stopped. When disaster strikes, compute is provisioned, easily meeting a 4-hour RTO while minimizing ongoing costs.

Common mistakes

Choosing Warm Standby, which is less cost-effective.

Practice the full AWS Solutions Architect Professional SAP-C02 Practice Exam 4

75 questions · hints · full answers · grading

More questions from this exam