Hard1 markMultiple Choice
Domain 4.4: Design network solutionsDomain 4Network SolutionsVirtual WANCase Study

AZ-305 · Question 51 · Domain 4.4: Design network solutions

CASE STUDY: Global Enterprise Network

Contoso Ltd is a global manufacturing company with 50,000 employees across 30 countries. They currently operate a mix of on-premises infrastructure (500 servers across 5 data centers) and Azure (20 subscriptions with 100+ VMs and various PaaS services). Their annual IT budget is $10 million, with plans to migrate 70% of workloads to Azure within 2 years.

The company needs to reduce IT costs by 30%, improve disaster recovery (current RTO: 24 hours -> target: 2 hours), enhance security posture to meet ISO 27001 and SOC 2 compliance, and enable remote work for 80% of employees. All solutions must support future growth of 20% annually.

Some legacy applications cannot be modified and must run on Windows Server 2012. Network connectivity requires 10 Gbps throughput to Azure with <20ms latency. GDPR compliance mandates that EU customer data must remain in European Azure regions.

QUESTION 1 OF 5:
Contoso needs to connect their 5 global data centers to Azure and provide any-to-any connectivity (e.g., Data Center 1 can talk to Data Center 2 via the Azure backbone). They also need to connect 20 different Azure VNets across 3 regions. They want a managed service that minimizes routing complexity.

Which network topology should you recommend?

Answer options:

A.

Azure Virtual WAN

B.

Traditional Hub and Spoke with VNet Peering

C.

Azure ExpressRoute Global Reach

D.

Azure Front Door

How to approach this question

Identify the need for global, any-to-any connectivity with minimal routing complexity. Virtual WAN is designed specifically to replace complex traditional hub-spoke setups for global enterprises.

Full Answer

A.Azure Virtual WAN✓ Correct
Azure Virtual WAN
Azure Virtual WAN is a networking service that brings many networking, security, and routing functionalities together to provide a single operational interface. It natively supports any-to-any connectivity. If Data Center 1 connects to the Virtual WAN hub in the US, and Data Center 2 connects to the hub in Europe, they can communicate over the Microsoft global backbone automatically. It abstracts away the complex UDR management required in a traditional DIY hub-and-spoke architecture.

Common mistakes

Choosing Traditional Hub and Spoke. While it's a valid architecture, it requires significant manual routing configuration (UDRs, NVAs) for transitive global routing, which the scenario explicitly wants to avoid.

Practice the full Azure Solutions Architect Expert AZ-305 Practice Exam 1

55 questions · hints · full answers · grading

More questions from this exam