Hard1 markMultiple Choice
Area III: Performing ProceduresAUDSamplingInternal Control

CPA · Question 16 · Area III: Performing Procedures

An auditor is evaluating the results of attribute sampling performed on a population of 2,000 purchase orders to test the authorization control. The sample size was 100. The auditor found 2 deviations. The calculated upper deviation rate at a 95% confidence level is 6.3%. The tolerable deviation rate established during planning was 7%. What is the auditor's MOST appropriate conclusion?

Answer options:

A.

The control is operating effectively because the upper deviation rate (6.3%) is less than the tolerable deviation rate (7%).

B.

The control is not operating effectively because the sample deviation rate (2%) is less than the tolerable rate, but sampling risk is too high.

C.

The auditor should increase the sample size because the upper deviation rate is close to the tolerable rate.

D.

The control is not operating effectively because the allowance for sampling risk (4.3%) is too large.

How to approach this question

Compare Upper Deviation Rate (UDR) vs Tolerable Deviation Rate (TDR). If UDR <= TDR, Good. If UDR > TDR, Bad.

Full Answer

A.The control is operating effectively because the upper deviation rate (6.3%) is less than the tolerable deviation rate (7%).✓ Correct
A
In attribute sampling, the auditor compares the computed upper deviation rate (which is the sample deviation rate plus an allowance for sampling risk) to the tolerable deviation rate. Since 6.3% < 7%, the auditor can conclude with 95% confidence that the actual population deviation rate does not exceed 7%, supporting the planned reliance on the control.

Common mistakes

Comparing the Sample Deviation Rate (2%) to the Tolerable Rate (7%) - this ignores sampling risk. Always use the Upper Deviation Rate.

Practice the full CPA AUD Practice Exam 2

78 questions · hints · full answers · grading

More questions from this exam