Hard1 markMultiple Choice
Area I: Ethics & Tax ProceduresREGBusiness LawLegal Duties

CPA · Question 08 · Area I: Ethics & Tax Procedures

A CPA firm negligently prepared a financial statement for a client. The firm knew the client intended to use the statement to obtain a loan from Bank A. However, the client actually used the statement to obtain a loan from Bank B. Bank B relied on the statement and suffered a loss. In a jurisdiction that follows the 'Ultramares' doctrine, is the CPA firm liable to Bank B?

Answer options:

A.

Yes, because the negligence caused the loss.

B.

Yes, because Bank B is a foreseen third party.

C.

No, because Bank B was contributory negligent.

D.

No, because there was no privity of contract between the CPA firm and Bank B.

How to approach this question

Identify the jurisdiction rule: Ultramares = Privity (strict). Restatement = Foreseen Class. Foreseeability = Any Foreseeable User.

Full Answer

D.No, because there was no privity of contract between the CPA firm and Bank B.✓ Correct
D
The Ultramares doctrine limits CPA liability for negligence to parties in privity of contract and specifically intended third-party beneficiaries. Since the CPA firm did not know of Bank B (they thought it was for Bank A), there is no privity, and thus no liability to Bank B for negligence.

Common mistakes

Applying the Restatement (Foreseen Third Party) rule instead of Ultramares.

Practice the full CPA REG Practice Exam 5

72 questions · hints · full answers · grading

More questions from this exam