Stakeholders in business organisations
Learning outcomes
- Define stakeholders and explain the agency relationship.
- Define internal, connected and external stakeholders.
- Identify the main stakeholder groups and their objectives.
- Explain how stakeholder groups interact and conflict.
- Compare power and interest using the Mendelow matrix.
Objective A: Define stakeholders and explain the agency relationship.
A stakeholder is any individual, group, or entity that can affect, or is affected by, the achievement of an organisation's objectives. They have a 'stake' or interest in the organisation's activities, successes, and failures. Stakeholders range from employees and shareholders to local communities and government regulators. Understanding stakeholders is critical because an organisation cannot survive in a vacuum; its success depends on managing the diverse and often competing expectations of these groups.
A fundamental concept in stakeholder theory is the 'agency relationship'. This arises when one party (the principal) delegates decision-making authority to another party (the agent) to act on their behalf. In a corporate context, the classic agency relationship exists between the shareholders (principals) and the board of directors/management (agents). The shareholders invest capital and expect the managers to run the business to maximize shareholder wealth.
However, this relationship often leads to the 'agency problem'. Because managers have different personal motivations (e.g., job security, high salaries, prestige) than shareholders (e.g., high dividends, share price growth), managers might make decisions that benefit themselves at the expense of the owners. For example, in 'VeloCorp', a fictional electric scooter manufacturer, the CEO (agent) might decide to buy a luxurious corporate jet to boost their own prestige, whereas the shareholders (principals) would prefer that money be reinvested in R&D or paid out as dividends. Corporate governance mechanisms exist primarily to align the interests of agents with those of the principals.
Agency Relationship
A contract under which one or more persons (the principals) engage another person (the agent) to perform some service on their behalf which involves delegating some decision-making authority to the agent.
- 1
Step 1: Establishing the Relationship
Thousands of retail investors buy shares in VeloCorp, becoming the owners (principals). Because they cannot run the factory daily, they hire a CEO, Ms. Vance, delegating operational control to her (the agent).
- 2
Step 2: Divergence of Interests
The shareholders want VeloCorp to maximize profits to increase dividend payouts. Ms. Vance, however, wants to expand the company rapidly into unproven markets to justify a massive increase in her executive bonus, despite the high risk of failure.
- 3
Step 3: The Agency Cost
Ms. Vance launches the risky expansion. It fails, costing the company millions. The shareholders suffer a drop in share price. This loss of value due to the misalignment of principal and agent objectives is known as an agency cost.
The agency relationship highlights the inherent risk when ownership is separated from control, necessitating strict monitoring and aligned incentive structures.
In the context of a large public limited company, who typically acts as the 'principal' in the primary agency relationship?
Which of the following best describes the 'agency problem'?
Which of the following is a common method used to reduce the agency problem in a corporation?
Objective B: Define internal, connected and external stakeholders.
Stakeholders are typically categorized into three distinct groups based on their relationship to the organisation's boundary: internal, connected, and external. Internal stakeholders are individuals or groups who are directly part of the organisation. They operate within the organisation's boundaries and are intimately involved in its daily functioning. This group primarily includes employees, management, and the board of directors. Their lives and careers are directly intertwined with the organisation's internal operations.
Connected stakeholders (sometimes called primary external stakeholders) are outside the organisation's boundary but have a direct, contractual, or commercial relationship with it. They deal with the organisation on a regular, transactional basis. This group includes shareholders (who provide capital), customers (who buy products), suppliers (who provide inputs), and financiers/banks (who provide loans). Without connected stakeholders, the business could not function commercially, as they form the immediate supply and demand chain.
External stakeholders (sometimes called secondary external stakeholders) are outside the organisation and do not have a direct commercial or contractual relationship with it, but are nonetheless affected by its actions or can influence its operations. This group includes the government and regulatory bodies, local communities, pressure groups (e.g., environmental activists), and the general public. For example, if 'NexaChem', a chemical plant, pollutes a local river, the local residents (external stakeholders) are severely affected despite having no commercial contract with NexaChem.
Shareholders: Internal or Connected?
A very common exam trap is classifying shareholders as internal stakeholders. Unless they are also employees/directors, shareholders are connected stakeholders because their relationship is based on a financial contract (equity), and they sit outside the daily operational boundary.
- 1
Step 1: Identifying Internal Stakeholders
The plant manager and the chemical engineers working on the factory floor are internal stakeholders. They are inside the organisational boundary, drawing salaries, and executing daily operations.
- 2
Step 2: Identifying Connected Stakeholders
The logistics company that delivers raw sulfur to NexaChem (supplier) and the agricultural firms that buy NexaChem's fertilizer (customers) are connected stakeholders. They exist outside the firm but hold direct commercial contracts.
- 3
Step 3: Identifying External Stakeholders
The Environmental Protection Agency (regulator) monitoring NexaChem's emissions, and the 'Clean River Alliance' (pressure group) protesting outside the gates, are external stakeholders. They have no commercial contracts but exert significant influence over the firm.
Correctly categorizing stakeholders is the first step in understanding how to manage their distinct expectations and influence.
Which of the following is an example of a 'connected' stakeholder for a retail supermarket?
Why are shareholders generally classified as connected stakeholders rather than internal stakeholders?
A pressure group is campaigning against a mining company's plans to clear a forest. How should this pressure group be classified?
Objective C: Identify the main stakeholder groups and their objectives.
Each stakeholder group interacts with an organisation to fulfill specific, often distinct, objectives. Understanding these objectives is crucial for management. Employees (internal) primarily seek job security, fair remuneration, safe working conditions, and career progression. Management (internal) seeks high salaries, performance bonuses, prestige, and organizational growth.
Among connected stakeholders, Shareholders seek a return on their investment through capital growth (increasing share price) and regular dividend payments. They also desire transparency and good corporate governance to protect their investment. Customers seek high-quality products or services, value for money, safety, and reliable after-sales support. Suppliers seek prompt payment, long-term stable contracts, and fair trading terms. Financiers (like banks) seek the timely repayment of principal and interest, and the maintenance of strong financial ratios to ensure the security of their loans.
External stakeholders have broader societal objectives. The Government seeks regulatory compliance, the prompt payment of corporate taxes, and the provision of employment within the economy. Local communities seek minimal environmental disruption (e.g., low noise, no pollution), local employment opportunities, and corporate social responsibility initiatives. Pressure groups seek to ensure the organisation aligns with their specific cause, whether that is environmental sustainability, fair trade, or human rights. For instance, in 'AeroLogix', an airline, customers want cheap flights, employees want higher wages, and environmental groups want reduced carbon emissions.
Objective Alignment
A business cannot satisfy all objectives simultaneously. The art of management is balancing these competing objectives to ensure the long-term survival of the organisation.
- 1
Step 1: The Financiers' Objective
AeroLogix took a $500 million loan to buy new aircraft. The bank's primary objective is risk minimization. They want AeroLogix to maintain high cash reserves to ensure the monthly interest payments are never missed.
- 2
Step 2: The Shareholders' Objective
The shareholders of AeroLogix want the company to maximize profits. They prefer the company to use its cash to pay out high dividends or aggressively expand routes to boost the share price, rather than hoarding cash as the bank desires.
- 3
Step 3: The Employees' Objective
The pilots and cabin crew union want a 10% pay rise and better working hours. Their objective is personal financial security and well-being, which directly increases the airline's operating costs, threatening both the bank's and the shareholders' objectives.
Identifying what each group wants is the prerequisite for understanding why conflicts arise within and around an organisation.
What is the primary objective of a supplier as a connected stakeholder?
Which stakeholder group is primarily concerned with job security, fair wages, and safe working conditions?
A local government council is evaluating a new factory proposed by a multinational corporation. What is likely to be the council's primary objective as an external stakeholder?
Objective D: Explain how stakeholder groups interact and conflict.
Because different stakeholder groups have fundamentally different objectives, conflict is inevitable. An organisation's resources are finite; a dollar spent satisfying one group is a dollar unavailable to satisfy another. The most classic conflict is between shareholders and employees. Shareholders want to maximize profits, which often means minimizing costs. Employees want higher wages and better benefits, which increases costs and reduces profits.
Conflicts also arise between connected and external stakeholders. For example, customers (connected) want cheap, mass-produced goods. However, achieving low prices might require manufacturing processes that cause pollution, angering the local community and environmental pressure groups (external). Furthermore, conflicts can occur within the same category. Different groups of shareholders might conflict: institutional investors (like pension funds) might want steady, long-term dividend yields, while speculative retail investors might want high-risk strategies for rapid short-term share price growth.
Consider 'TimberCore', a forestry company. TimberCore's management wants to clear-cut a large forest to maximize quarterly profits to satisfy shareholders and secure their own bonuses. However, an environmental NGO (external) launches a massive public relations campaign against them, threatening a consumer boycott. The customers (connected) become concerned about the brand's ethics and threaten to switch to a competitor. Here, the interaction is complex: the external stakeholder influences the connected stakeholder, forcing the internal stakeholders to alter their strategy to protect the shareholders' long-term interests.
Identifying Conflicts
Exam questions often present a scenario and ask you to identify which two stakeholder groups are in conflict. Always trace the financial or operational impact of a decision to see who wins and who loses.
- 1
Step 1: The Strategic Decision
TimberCore decides to automate its sawmills to reduce costs by 20%. This decision is designed to increase profit margins, directly satisfying the primary objective of the shareholders.
- 2
Step 2: The Internal Conflict
The automation will result in 500 workers losing their jobs. The employees and their trade union immediately announce a strike. This is a direct conflict between Shareholders (seeking cost reduction) and Employees (seeking job security).
- 3
Step 3: The External Ripple Effect
The local government, facing a sudden spike in unemployment and a drop in local tax revenue, revokes TimberCore's tax subsidies. The conflict has now expanded, pitting the company's management against external regulatory stakeholders.
Stakeholder conflict is dynamic. A decision made to satisfy one group almost always triggers a reaction from others.
A company decides to relocate its manufacturing plant to a country with lower labor costs to increase its profit margins. Which two stakeholder groups are most likely to be in direct conflict over this decision?
A pharmaceutical company is pressured by a patient advocacy group to lower the price of a life-saving drug. If the company agrees, which stakeholder group is most likely to be negatively affected?
Why might conflict arise between a company's management and its bank (financier)?
Objective E: Compare power and interest using the Mendelow matrix.
To manage conflicting stakeholder objectives, organisations must prioritize them. The Mendelow Matrix is a strategic tool that categorizes stakeholders based on two variables: their level of Power (ability to influence the organisation) and their level of Interest (how much they care about the organisation's actions). This creates a 2x2 grid with four distinct management strategies.
- Low Power, Low Interest (Minimal Effort): These stakeholders (e.g., temporary contractors, distant public) require minimal attention. The strategy is to do just enough to prevent them from gaining interest or power.
- Low Power, High Interest (Keep Informed): These stakeholders (e.g., local community groups, lower-level employees) care deeply but lack the power to force change. The strategy is to keep them informed through good communication. If ignored, they might lobby a high-power group (like the media or government) to act on their behalf.
- High Power, Low Interest (Keep Satisfied): These stakeholders (e.g., institutional investors, government regulators) have immense power but are currently passive. The strategy is to keep them satisfied so they do not use their power against the firm. For example, pay taxes on time so the regulator ignores you.
- High Power, High Interest (Key Players): These stakeholders (e.g., major customers, majority shareholders, powerful trade unions during a dispute) must be actively managed. Their objectives must be incorporated into the corporate strategy, as they can make or break the organisation.
Consider 'OrbitTech', a satellite launch company. A major government defense contract represents 60% of their revenue; this government agency is a Key Player (High Power, High Interest). A local bird-watching society is worried about launch noise; they are Keep Informed (Low Power, High Interest). OrbitTech's passive institutional investors just want steady returns; they are Keep Satisfied (High Power, Low Interest). By mapping these groups, OrbitTech knows exactly where to focus its public relations and strategic efforts.
Dynamic Matrix
Stakeholders do not stay in one box forever. A 'Keep Satisfied' stakeholder (e.g., a passive regulator) can instantly become a 'Key Player' if a scandal breaks out, drastically increasing their interest.
- 1
Step 1: Assessing the Local Bird-Watching Society
The society is highly interested because launches disrupt nesting. However, they have only 50 members and no legal authority to stop launches (Low Power). OrbitTech's strategy is 'Keep Informed'—sending them launch schedules in advance to mitigate anger.
- 2
Step 2: Assessing the Institutional Investor
A massive pension fund owns 30% of OrbitTech. They have immense voting power (High Power) but are currently passive, just collecting dividends (Low Interest). OrbitTech's strategy is 'Keep Satisfied'—ensuring dividends are paid so the fund doesn't interfere with management.
- 3
Step 3: A Shift in the Matrix
OrbitTech accidentally spills rocket fuel near the nesting grounds. The bird-watching society contacts national media and a powerful politician. Suddenly, the politician (High Power) takes a High Interest. The politician becomes a 'Key Player', forcing OrbitTech to halt operations.
The Mendelow matrix dictates resource allocation in stakeholder management and highlights the danger of ignoring 'Keep Informed' groups who might mobilize powerful allies.
According to the Mendelow matrix, what is the appropriate strategy for managing a stakeholder group with High Power and Low Interest?
A local community group is highly concerned about the noise from a nearby factory, but they have no legal or financial leverage over the company. How should the company manage this group according to Mendelow?
Why is it dangerous for an organisation to ignore stakeholders in the 'Low Power, High Interest' quadrant?
Expert