Hard30 marksExtended Response
Planning and Risk AssessmentAudit RiskInternal ControlsPurchasing CycleProvisions

ACCA · Question 16 · Planning and Risk Assessment

CASE SCENARIO: Titanium Forge Industries
Titanium Forge Industries is a heavy manufacturing company specializing in aerospace components. You are the audit manager for the year ending 31 October 20X7.

During your planning meeting with the Finance Director, you noted the following:

  1. The company has significant Work-in-Progress (WIP) inventory. Manufacturing an aerospace component can take up to 6 months. WIP is valued based on standard costs, which include an allocation of manufacturing overheads based on estimated machine hours.
  2. Titanium Forge recently undertook a major factory overhaul, replacing several heavy stamping machines. The company's policy is to capitalize all costs associated with the overhaul, including the cost of routine maintenance performed at the same time.
  3. The company provides a 3-year warranty on all aerospace components. Due to a recent design flaw discovered in a batch of components shipped in August 20X7, several customers have filed warranty claims. Management has not yet updated the warranty provision, stating they are waiting to see how many more claims arrive.

Furthermore, during interim testing of the purchasing and payables cycle, your team noted the following control deficiencies:

  • Purchase orders for raw materials (titanium alloys) can be raised and authorized by the same procurement clerk.
  • Goods Received Notes (GRNs) are manually written and are not sequentially numbered.
  • Purchase invoices are processed by the accounts team without being matched to a GRN.

REQUIREMENTS:
(a) Describe FOUR audit risks and explain the auditor's response to each risk in planning the audit of Titanium Forge Industries. (16 marks)
(b) Identify and explain THREE internal control deficiencies in the purchasing and payables cycle described above. For each deficiency, explain the possible implication and provide a recommendation to address it. (14 marks)

How to approach this question

For part (a), structure your answer clearly: State the risk (what could be wrong in the financial statements), explain WHY it's a risk based on the scenario, and then provide a specific, actionable audit response. For part (b), use a tabular format if possible: Deficiency (from the scenario) -> Implication (what could go wrong financially/operationally) -> Recommendation (how to fix the control).

Full Answer

This question tests the ability to apply theoretical knowledge of audit risk and internal controls to a specific, complex manufacturing scenario. It requires understanding of accounting standards to identify risks of material misstatement and practical business sense to identify control weaknesses and suggest improvements.

Common mistakes

In part (a), students often give business risks (e.g., 'the company might lose customers due to the flaw') instead of audit risks ('provisions may be understated'). In part (b), recommendations are often too vague (e.g., 'improve the system') rather than specific control activities.

Practice the full ACCA AA — Audit and Assurance Practice Exam 6

18 questions · hints · full answers · grading

More questions from this exam