For IndividualsFor Educators
ExpertMinds LogoExpertMinds
ExpertMinds

Ace your certifications with Practice Exams and AI assistance.

  • Browse Exams
  • For Educators
  • Blog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookie Policy
  • Support
  • AWS SAA Exam Prep
  • PMI PMP Exam Prep
  • CPA Exam Prep
  • GCP PCA Exam Prep

© 2026 TinyHive Labs. Company number 16262776.

    PracticeACCAACCA LW — Corporate and Business Law Practice Exam 4Question 58
    Hard2 marksMultiple Choice
    Corporate and Business LawSection BSyllabus GInsolvency LawMTQ

    ACCA · Question 58 · Corporate and Business Law

    SCENARIO 5: Titanium Foundry Ltd went into insolvent liquidation on 1 November. Six months prior, on 1 May, when the company was already hopelessly insolvent, the directors granted a floating charge over the company's inventory to a connected person (the CEO's brother) to secure an old, existing debt of £50,000. No new money was advanced to the company.

    Under Section 245 of the Insolvency Act 1986, what is the status of this floating charge?

    Answer options:

    A.

    It is valid, because floating charges can be created at any time before liquidation.

    B.

    It is valid, because it was registered at Companies House.

    C.

    It is invalid, because it was created within the relevant time limit in favor of a connected person to secure past debt.

    D.

    It is invalid, but only if the liquidator can prove the CEO's brother acted fraudulently.

    How to approach this question

    Apply the rules regarding the invalidation of floating charges created prior to insolvency.

    Full Answer

    C.It is invalid, because it was created within the relevant time limit in favor of a connected person to secure past debt.✓ Correct
    Section 245 of the Insolvency Act 1986 invalidates floating charges created within a certain time before the onset of insolvency, unless 'new money' was advanced to the company at the same time. For connected persons (like family members of directors), the relevant time is 2 years prior to insolvency. Since this charge was created 6 months prior, to a connected person, for an old debt (no new money), it is entirely invalid.

    Common mistakes

    Confusing this with a preference (s.239) or a transaction at an undervalue (s.238). While related, s.245 specifically targets floating charges.
    Question 57All questionsQuestion 59

    Practice the full ACCA LW — Corporate and Business Law Practice Exam 4

    60 questions · hints · full answers · grading

    Sign up freeTake the exam

    More questions from this exam

    Q01AgriGrow Ltd, a large-scale agricultural technology firm, is pursuing a complex breach of contrac...MediumQ02In the context of judicial precedent, the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) is generally bound by ...MediumQ03Under the Human Rights Act 1998, what action must a UK court take if it finds that a piece of pri...MediumQ04QuantumLeap Tech, a startup, displays a highly specialized server rack on its website with a pric...MediumQ05A cross-border logistics company, TransGlobal Freight, urgently asks an independent consultant to...Hard
    View all 60 questions →