For IndividualsFor Educators
ExpertMinds LogoExpertMinds
ExpertMinds

Ace your certifications with Practice Exams and AI assistance.

  • Browse Exams
  • For Educators
  • Blog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookie Policy
  • Support
  • AWS SAA Exam Prep
  • PMI PMP Exam Prep
  • CPA Exam Prep
  • GCP PCA Exam Prep

© 2026 TinyHive Labs. Company number 16262776.

    PracticeACCAACCA LW — Corporate and Business Law Practice Exam 5Question 54
    Hard2 marksMultiple Choice
    The formation and constitution of business organisationsSyllabus DArticles of AssociationAlteration
    This question is part of a case study — click to read the full scenario(Case 52)

    Section B - Scenario 3

    SCENARIO: 'Lunar Logistics Ltd' is a space-freight startup. Before the company is officially incorporated at Companies House, the founders (promoters) sign a £50,000 contract with 'RocketTech' to purchase fuel tanks. The contract is signed 'by John, on behalf of Lunar Logistics Ltd'. Two weeks later, the company is incorporated. The board of directors immediately passes a resolution stating that the company 'adopts and ratifies' the fuel tank contract.

    QUESTION: Who was legally liable on the contract at the exact moment it was signed?

    View full case study page →

    ACCA · Question 54 · The formation and constitution of business organisations

    Section B - Scenario 3

    SCENARIO: 'Lunar Logistics Ltd' is a space-freight startup. Before the company is officially incorporated at Companies House, the founders (promoters) sign a £50,000 contract with 'RocketTech' to purchase fuel tanks. The contract is signed 'by John, on behalf of Lunar Logistics Ltd'. Two weeks later, the company is incorporated. The board of directors immediately passes a resolution stating that the company 'adopts and ratifies' the fuel tank contract.

    QUESTION: Later, the majority shareholders of Lunar Logistics Ltd want to alter the Articles of Association to include a clause allowing them to forcibly buy out the shares of any minority shareholder who competes with the company. Under what condition will the court allow this alteration?

    Answer options:

    A.

    Only if 100% of the shareholders agree to it.

    B.

    Only if the alteration is made bona fide for the benefit of the company as a whole.

    C.

    It is never allowed; articles cannot be altered to expropriate shares.

    D.

    Only if the minority shareholder is compensated at double the market value.

    How to approach this question

    Apply the common law test for altering articles of association.

    Full Answer

    B.Only if the alteration is made bona fide for the benefit of the company as a whole.✓ Correct
    While a company can alter its articles by special resolution (s.21 CA 2006), common law dictates that any alteration must be exercised 'bona fide for the benefit of the company as a whole' (Allen v Gold Reefs). An alteration to expropriate shares (force a buyout) is heavily scrutinized and usually only valid if the minority shareholder is harming the company (e.g., competing with it).

    Common mistakes

    Thinking that a 75% majority can alter the articles to do absolutely anything they want, ignoring the common law protection for minorities.
    Question 53All questionsQuestion 55

    Practice the full ACCA LW — Corporate and Business Law Practice Exam 5

    60 questions · hints · full answers · grading

    Sign up freeTake the exam

    More questions from this exam

    Q01Section A In the context of the English legal system, an AI ethics consultancy is appealing a de...MediumQ02Section A A statute regulating commercial drone flights was drafted in 2015. A new case involves...MediumQ03Section A Under the Human Rights Act 1998, what is the legal effect if a UK court finds that a p...MediumQ04Section A NovaTech Ltd offers to sell a batch of quantum processors to Q-Compute Plc. Q-Compute ...MediumQ05Section A During a severe economic downturn, a landlord agrees to accept half rent from a commer...Hard
    View all 60 questions →