For IndividualsFor Educators
ExpertMinds LogoExpertMinds
ExpertMinds

Ace your certifications with Practice Exams and AI assistance.

  • Browse Exams
  • For Educators
  • Blog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookie Policy
  • Support
  • AWS SAA Exam Prep
  • PMI PMP Exam Prep
  • CPA Exam Prep
  • GCP PCA Exam Prep

© 2026 TinyHive Labs. Company number 16262776.

    PracticeACCAACCA LW — Corporate and Business Law Practice Exam 5Question 55
    Medium2 marksMultiple Choice
    Management, administration and the regulation of companiesSyllabus FDirectors' DutiesConflict of Interest

    ACCA · Question 55 · Management, administration and the regulation of companies

    Section B - Scenario 4

    SCENARIO: 'BioSynth Plc' is a synthetic biology firm. Dr. Aris is a director. BioSynth is approached by an investor offering a lucrative contract to develop a new enzyme. The board of BioSynth declines the contract because the company lacks the specific lab equipment required. Dr. Aris, seeing the potential, resigns from BioSynth and sets up his own private company, 'ArisEnzymes Ltd', which buys the equipment and takes the contract for itself, making a £500,000 profit.

    QUESTION: Which specific statutory duty under the Companies Act 2006 has Dr. Aris most likely breached?

    Answer options:

    A.

    Section 171: Duty to act within powers.

    B.

    Section 174: Duty to exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence.

    C.

    Section 175: Duty to avoid conflicts of interest.

    D.

    Section 177: Duty to declare interest in proposed transaction.

    How to approach this question

    Identify the duty relating to corporate opportunities and conflicts.

    Full Answer

    C.Section 175: Duty to avoid conflicts of interest.✓ Correct
    Section 175 of the Companies Act 2006 requires a director to avoid a situation in which they have a direct or indirect interest that conflicts with the interests of the company. This specifically applies to the exploitation of any property, information, or opportunity. The fact that the company rejected the opportunity, or that he resigned to take it, does not prevent the breach (s.175(2) and s.170(2)).

    Common mistakes

    Assuming that because the company rejected the contract, the director is free to take it. Case law (e.g., Regal (Hastings) Ltd v Gulliver, IDC v Cooley) strictly prohibits this without shareholder approval.
    Question 54All questionsQuestion 56

    Practice the full ACCA LW — Corporate and Business Law Practice Exam 5

    60 questions · hints · full answers · grading

    Sign up freeTake the exam

    More questions from this exam

    Q01Section A In the context of the English legal system, an AI ethics consultancy is appealing a de...MediumQ02Section A A statute regulating commercial drone flights was drafted in 2015. A new case involves...MediumQ03Section A Under the Human Rights Act 1998, what is the legal effect if a UK court finds that a p...MediumQ04Section A NovaTech Ltd offers to sell a batch of quantum processors to Q-Compute Plc. Q-Compute ...MediumQ05Section A During a severe economic downturn, a landlord agrees to accept half rent from a commer...Hard
    View all 60 questions →