Medium2 marksMultiple Choice
Decision-making techniquesSyllabus CJoint ProductsFurther Processing Decision

ACCA · Question 20 · Decision-making techniques

Section B - Case 1: AquaHarvest

AquaHarvest operates a sustainable offshore kelp farm. The farm produces two joint products: Premium Kelp and Standard Kelp. The joint processing costs are $50,000 per month. Premium Kelp can be sold at the split-off point for $30,000. Alternatively, it can be further processed into Kelp Supplements at an additional cost of $15,000, and then sold for $48,000.

Should AquaHarvest process the Premium Kelp further, and what is the incremental financial impact?

Answer options:

A.

Do not process further, as the total cost ($65,000) exceeds the final revenue ($48,000).

B.

Process further, as it increases profit by $3,000.

C.

Process further, as it increases profit by $18,000.

D.

Do not process further, as it decreases profit by $2,000.

How to approach this question

Compare the incremental revenue from further processing with the incremental cost of further processing. Ignore joint costs.

Full Answer

B.Process further, as it increases profit by $3,000.✓ Correct
The decision to process further should be based on incremental revenues and incremental costs. Joint costs ($50,000) are sunk and irrelevant. Incremental revenue from further processing = $48,000 (final price) - $30,000 (split-off price) = $18,000. Incremental cost of further processing = $15,000. Net benefit of further processing = $18,000 - $15,000 = $3,000 increase in profit. Therefore, process further.

Common mistakes

Including the $50,000 joint costs in the decision-making process.

Practice the full ACCA PM — Performance Management Practice Exam 2

32 questions · hints · full answers · grading

More questions from this exam