Hard30 marksExtended Response
Shakespeare and the 19th-Century NovelThe Sign of FourConan DoyleJonathan SmallVillain

AQA GCSE · Question 13 · Shakespeare and the 19th-Century Novel

SOURCE TEXT:
Read the following extract from Chapter 11 (The Great Agra Treasure) of The Sign of Four and then answer the question that follows.

In this extract, Jonathan Small has just been captured after the chase down the River Thames.

Our captive sat in the cabin opposite to the iron box which he had done so much and waited so long to gain. He was a sunburned reckless-eyed fellow, with a network of lines and wrinkles all over his mahogany features, which told of a hard, open-air life. There was a singular prominence about his bearded chin which marked a man who was not to be easily turned from his purpose. His age may have been fifty or thereabouts, for his black, curly hair was thickly shot with grey. His face in repose was not an unpleasing one, though his heavy brows and aggressive chin gave him, as I had lately seen, a terrible expression when moved to anger. He sat now with his handcuffed hands upon his lap, and his head sunk upon his breast, while he looked with his keen, twinkling eyes at the box which had been the cause of his ill-doings. It seemed to me that there was more sorrow than anger in his rigid and contained countenance. Once he looked up at me with a gleam of something like humour in his eyes.
'Well, Jonathan Small,' said Holmes, lighting a cigar, 'I am sorry that it has come to this.'
'And so am I, sir,' he answered frankly. ‘I don't believe that I can swing over the job. I give you my word on the book that I never raised hand against Mr Sholto. It was that little hell-hound, Tonga, who shot one of his cursed darts into him. I had no part in it, sir. I was as grieved as if it had been my blood-relation. I welted the little devil with the slack end of the rope for it, but it was done, and I could not undo it again.'
'Have a cigar,' said Holmes; 'and you had best take a pull out of my flask, for you are very wet. How could you expect so small and weak a man as this black fellow to overpower Mr Sholto and hold him while you were climbing the rope?'
'You seem to know as much about it as if you were there, sir. The truth is that I hoped to find the room clear. I knew the habits of the house pretty well, and it was the time when Mr Sholto usually went down to his supper. I shall make no secret of the business. The best defence that I can make is just the simple truth. Now, if it had been the old major I would have swung for him with a light heart. I would have thought no more of knifing him than of smoking this cigar. But it's cursed hard that I should be lagged over this young Sholto, with whom I had no quarrel whatever.'

QUESTION:
Starting with this extract, explore how far Conan Doyle presents Jonathan Small as a villain.

Write about:
• how Conan Doyle presents Jonathan Small in this extract
• how far Conan Doyle presents Jonathan Small as a villain in the novel as a whole.

How to approach this question

1. Analyse the description of Small in the extract. Note the contrast between his threatening appearance and his sorrowful, frank demeanour. 2. Formulate a thesis that argues Small is presented as a complex antagonist rather than a simple villain. 3. Structure your essay to explore the evidence for and against him being a villain. Discuss his criminal actions (theft, complicity in murder). 4. Then, discuss the mitigating factors: his backstory of betrayal, his loyalty to the 'Four', and his own code of honour. 5. Contrast Small with his companion, Tonga, who is presented as a more savage and unambiguously villainous figure. 6. Conclude by summarising how Conan Doyle creates a morally ambiguous character who elicits a degree of sympathy from the reader, despite his crimes.

Full Answer

A strong answer will argue that Conan Doyle presents Jonathan Small as a complex character who is not a straightforward villain. The extract shows this ambiguity: Watson's description notes his 'terrible expression' but also that his face is 'not an unpleasing one' and shows 'more sorrow than anger'. Small himself denies direct responsibility for Sholto's murder, blaming Tonga, and expresses a rough sense of justice, distinguishing between the 'old major' who wronged him and the innocent 'young Sholto'. The answer should then explore his backstory, which is revealed later in the novel. Small is a victim of betrayal by Major Sholto and Captain Morstan, and his pursuit of the treasure is driven by a desire for what he believes is rightfully his. While he is a criminal who is complicit in murder and theft, his loyalty to his 'three' comrades and his understandable sense of grievance complicate his status as a simple villain. He is presented more as a tragic, vengeful figure, a product of the greed and corruption of the British Empire, rather than an embodiment of pure evil.
This question asks for a character analysis of Jonathan Small, focusing on whether he is a conventional villain. The extract introduces him as a complex figure. Your essay should explore this complexity by examining his actions, his motivations, and his backstory. A good answer will argue that while he is an antagonist and a criminal, Conan Doyle provides him with a sympathetic history and a rough code of ethics that prevents the reader from seeing him as purely evil.

Common mistakes

A common mistake is to present a one-sided argument, either condemning Small as a murderer or fully excusing his actions because of his past. The key is to explore the ambiguity. Another error is to forget to discuss his backstory, which is crucial for a full understanding of his character and motivations. Ensure you analyse his own words and Watson's description of him.

Practice the full AQA GCSE English Literature Paper 1

13 questions · hints · full answers · grading

More questions from this exam