For IndividualsFor Educators
ExpertMinds LogoExpertMinds
ExpertMinds

Ace your certifications with Practice Exams and AI assistance.

  • Browse Exams
  • For Educators
  • Blog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookie Policy
  • Support
  • AWS SAA Exam Prep
  • PMI PMP Exam Prep
  • CPA Exam Prep
  • GCP PCA Exam Prep

© 2026 TinyHive Labs. Company number 16262776.

    PracticeCPA®CPA AUD Practice Exam 4Question 02
    Hard1 markMultiple Choice
    Area I: Ethics & General PrinciplesAUDIndependencePCAOB

    CPA · Question 02 · Area I: Ethics & General Principles

    An auditor is performing an audit of an issuer, Global Corp, in accordance with PCAOB standards. The auditor discovers that the client's Chief Financial Officer (CFO) was the lead engagement partner on the audit five years ago. The CFO left the CPA firm four years ago. Which of the following correctly describes the independence implications under SEC and PCAOB rules?

    Answer options:

    A.

    Independence is impaired because a former partner in a financial reporting oversight role permanently impairs independence.

    B.

    Independence is impaired because the cooling-off period is five years for lead partners.

    C.

    Independence is not impaired because the one-year cooling-off period has been satisfied.

    D.

    Independence is impaired unless the audit committee pre-approves the employment relationship.

    How to approach this question

    Distinguish between partner rotation rules (5 years) and employment cooling-off rules (1 year preceding the start of the audit).

    Full Answer

    C.Independence is not impaired because the one-year cooling-off period has been satisfied.✓ Correct
    Independence is not impaired because the one-year cooling-off period has been satisfied.
    Under SEC Rule 2-01(c)(2)(iii)(B), an accounting firm is not independent if a former member of the audit engagement team is employed by the issuer in a Financial Reporting Oversight Role (FROR) unless the individual has completed a 'cooling-off' period equivalent to one annual audit cycle (effectively one year). Since the CFO left 4 years ago, independence is not impaired.

    Common mistakes

    Confusing the 5-year partner rotation rule with the 1-year employment cooling-off period.
    Question 01All questionsQuestion 03

    Practice the full CPA AUD Practice Exam 4

    78 questions · hints · full answers · grading

    Sign up freeTake the exam

    More questions from this exam

    Q01A CPA firm is performing an audit of a nonissuer, TechInnovate Inc. The engagement partner's spou...HardQ03A CPA is performing an audit of a county government entity that receives federal financial assist...HardQ04During the audit of an employee benefit plan subject to ERISA, the auditor discovers that the pla...HardQ05An auditor is evaluating the 'integrity' principle of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct. Whi...MediumQ06During the planning phase of an audit of a nonissuer, the auditor is establishing an understandin...Medium
    View all 78 questions →