Hard1 markMultiple Choice
Area I: Ethics & General PrinciplesAUDProfessional SkepticismSpecialist

CPA · Question 04 · Area I: Ethics & General Principles

A CPA is engaged to audit the financial statements of a nonissuer. During the audit, the CPA encounters a complex valuation issue involving a derivative. The CPA decides to use an auditor's specialist. To maintain the appropriate level of professional skepticism, the CPA should:

Answer options:

A.

Accept the specialist's findings as audit evidence without further evaluation, provided the specialist is qualified.

B.

Evaluate the adequacy of the specialist's work, including the relevance and reasonableness of the specialist's findings or conclusions.

C.

Require the specialist to provide a separate opinion on the derivative valuation to be attached to the audit report.

D.

Perform the valuation independently to verify the specialist's results.

How to approach this question

Refer to AU-C 620 regarding the use of an auditor's specialist. Skepticism requires validation, not blind trust.

Full Answer

B.Evaluate the adequacy of the specialist's work, including the relevance and reasonableness of the specialist's findings or conclusions.✓ Correct
Evaluate the adequacy of the specialist's work, including the relevance and reasonableness of the specialist's findings or conclusions.
According to AU-C 620, the auditor must evaluate the adequacy of the specialist's work for the auditor's purposes. This includes evaluating the relevance and reasonableness of the specialist's findings and assumptions. Professional skepticism requires the auditor to critically assess the evidence, not merely accept it based on the specialist's credentials.

Common mistakes

Thinking that checking the specialist's qualifications (competence/objectivity) is sufficient without evaluating their actual work.

Practice the full CPA AUD Practice Exam 5

78 questions · hints · full answers · grading

More questions from this exam