Medium2 marksMultiple Choice
Corporate and Business LawSection BSyllabus BObligationsMTQ
This question is part of a case study — click to read the full scenario(Case 46)

SCENARIO 1: AeroLogistics Ltd, a cross-border freight forwarder, emails a quote to ship machinery for Zenith Manufacturing, stating 'Subject to AeroLogistics Standard Terms'. Zenith replies with a purchase order stating 'Order placed subject to Zenith Purchasing Terms'. AeroLogistics receives the order, does not object, and ships the machinery.

Under contract law, whose terms govern the contract?

ACCA · Question 47 · Corporate and Business Law

SCENARIO 1: AeroLogistics Ltd, a cross-border freight forwarder, emails a quote to ship machinery for Zenith Manufacturing, stating 'Subject to AeroLogistics Standard Terms'. Zenith replies with a purchase order stating 'Order placed subject to Zenith Purchasing Terms'. AeroLogistics receives the order, does not object, and ships the machinery.

Assume AeroLogistics' terms did apply. One term states: 'AeroLogistics accepts no liability whatsoever for damage to goods caused by our own negligence.' Under the Unfair Contract Terms Act (UCTA) 1977, is this clause valid in a business-to-business contract?

Answer options:

A.

It is absolutely void and can never be enforced.

B.

It is automatically valid because it is a business-to-business contract.

C.

It is valid only if it satisfies the requirement of reasonableness.

D.

It is valid only if Zenith signed the document in wet ink.

How to approach this question

Apply UCTA 1977 rules regarding the exclusion of liability for negligence causing property damage.

Full Answer

C.It is valid only if it satisfies the requirement of reasonableness.✓ Correct
Under Section 2 of the Unfair Contract Terms Act (UCTA) 1977, a business cannot exclude liability for death or personal injury caused by negligence (absolutely void). However, for other loss or damage (like property damage to machinery), a clause excluding liability for negligence is valid only if it satisfies the UCTA 'reasonableness' test.

Common mistakes

Thinking all exclusion clauses for negligence are void, confusing property damage with personal injury.

Practice the full ACCA LW — Corporate and Business Law Practice Exam 4

60 questions · hints · full answers · grading

More questions from this exam