For IndividualsFor Educators
ExpertMinds LogoExpertMinds
ExpertMinds

Ace your certifications with Practice Exams and AI assistance.

  • Browse Exams
  • For Educators
  • Blog
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookie Policy
  • Support
  • AWS SAA Exam Prep
  • PMI PMP Exam Prep
  • CPA Exam Prep
  • GCP PCA Exam Prep

© 2026 TinyHive Labs. Company number 16262776.

    PracticeACCAACCA LW — Corporate and Business Law Practice Exam 4Question 48
    Hard2 marksMultiple Choice
    Corporate and Business LawSection BSyllabus BObligationsMTQ
    This question is part of a case study — click to read the full scenario(Case 46)

    SCENARIO 1: AeroLogistics Ltd, a cross-border freight forwarder, emails a quote to ship machinery for Zenith Manufacturing, stating 'Subject to AeroLogistics Standard Terms'. Zenith replies with a purchase order stating 'Order placed subject to Zenith Purchasing Terms'. AeroLogistics receives the order, does not object, and ships the machinery.

    Under contract law, whose terms govern the contract?

    View full case study page →

    ACCA · Question 48 · Corporate and Business Law

    SCENARIO 1: AeroLogistics Ltd, a cross-border freight forwarder, emails a quote to ship machinery for Zenith Manufacturing, stating 'Subject to AeroLogistics Standard Terms'. Zenith replies with a purchase order stating 'Order placed subject to Zenith Purchasing Terms'. AeroLogistics receives the order, does not object, and ships the machinery.

    During transit, AeroLogistics breaches the contract, causing a 2-week delay. Zenith loses a £10,000 contract because of the delay. Zenith could have rented replacement machinery locally for £1,000 to fulfill their contract but chose not to. How much in damages is Zenith likely to recover?

    Answer options:

    A.

    £10,000, because that is the actual loss suffered.

    B.

    £11,000, combining the lost contract and the potential rental cost.

    C.

    £1,000, because Zenith failed to mitigate their loss.

    D.

    £0, because delays are an accepted risk in shipping.

    How to approach this question

    Apply the contractual duty to mitigate losses.

    Full Answer

    C.£1,000, because Zenith failed to mitigate their loss.✓ Correct
    In contract law, the innocent party has a duty to mitigate their losses (take reasonable steps to minimize the financial impact of the breach). If Zenith could have saved the £10,000 contract by spending £1,000 on a rental, it was unreasonable not to do so. Therefore, the court will limit their damages to the amount they would have lost had they mitigated (£1,000).

    Common mistakes

    Assuming the party in breach must pay for all consequences, regardless of the innocent party's inaction.
    Question 47All questionsQuestion 49

    Practice the full ACCA LW — Corporate and Business Law Practice Exam 4

    60 questions · hints · full answers · grading

    Sign up freeTake the exam

    More questions from this exam

    Q01AgriGrow Ltd, a large-scale agricultural technology firm, is pursuing a complex breach of contrac...MediumQ02In the context of judicial precedent, the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) is generally bound by ...MediumQ03Under the Human Rights Act 1998, what action must a UK court take if it finds that a piece of pri...MediumQ04QuantumLeap Tech, a startup, displays a highly specialized server rack on its website with a pric...MediumQ05A cross-border logistics company, TransGlobal Freight, urgently asks an independent consultant to...Hard
    View all 60 questions →