Hard5 marksExtended Response
AQA GCSE · Question 21 · Cognition and Behaviour
Evaluate Hughes' 'policeman doll study'.
Evaluate Hughes' 'policeman doll study'.
How to approach this question
To evaluate the study, you need to discuss its strengths and weaknesses. Aim for a balanced argument with at least one strength and one weakness, explained in detail.
- **Strengths:** Consider the improvements it made on Piaget's study. Did the task make more sense? Was the procedure well-controlled?
- **Weaknesses:** Consider the limitations of the study. Was it artificial (lacking ecological validity)? Could there have been experimenter bias? Were the children's responses interpreted correctly?
Full Answer
One major strength of Hughes' study is that the task made more sense to the children than Piaget's three mountains task. The 'hide from the policeman' scenario was a game that children could understand, which means the study likely tested their perspective-taking abilities more directly, rather than their ability to understand an abstract task. This gives the study greater validity than Piaget's.
Another strength is that the researcher took steps to ensure the children understood the task. For example, they were given practice trials with just one policeman doll before the main task with two. This careful procedure helps to ensure that the results were a genuine reflection of the children's abilities.
However, a potential weakness is that the researcher may have unconsciously given subtle cues to the children about where to hide the doll. This experimenter bias could have influenced the children's choices and inflated the success rate. Also, while the task was more sensible than Piaget's, it was still a laboratory experiment using dolls and models, which may not accurately reflect how children behave in real-life perspective-taking situations, thus lacking some ecological validity.
Evaluating Hughes' study involves considering its methodological strengths and weaknesses. Its primary strength lies in its improved design compared to Piaget's original work. By creating a task that was more engaging and understandable for young children, Hughes provided a more valid test of egocentrism. The careful, standardised procedure also adds to its scientific credibility. However, like many laboratory studies, it can be criticised for lacking ecological validity – the artificial setup with dolls may not fully represent real-world social perspective-taking. There is also the potential for experimenter bias, where the researcher's hopes for a particular outcome might subtly influence how they interact with the child participants. Despite these limitations, the study was highly influential in demonstrating that Piaget may have underestimated children's cognitive abilities.
Common mistakes
Describing the study again instead of evaluating it. Only providing one point of evaluation. Not explaining the evaluation points clearly (e.g., just saying 'it lacks ecological validity' without explaining why).
Practice the full AQA GCSE Psychology Paper 1
37 questions · hints · full answers · grading
More questions from this exam
Q01Which is the best example of information that would be stored as procedural memory?EasyQ02Which of the following statements about short-term memory (STM) is true?EasyQ03Evaluate the multi-store model of memory.HardQ04Describe Bartlett's 'War of the Ghosts' study.MediumQ05Read the following information.
A police officer is reading the statements of two eyewitnesses. ...Hard
Expert